Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°æºÎ º´¼Ò¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Ä¡Àº ÅðÃà Ä¡·á¿¡ ÀÖ¾î °áü Á¶Á÷ À̽İú ¼öº¹ Ä¡·á¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÁõ·Ê

CTG and restoration in treatment of gingival recession associated with a cervical lesion: report of three cases

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 39±Ç 4È£ p.437 ~ 441
±èÀº¼÷, ¹ÚÁø¿ì, ¼­Á¶¿µ, ÀÌÀç¸ñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀº¼÷ ( Kim Eun-Suk ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÁø¿ì ( Park Jin-Woo ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
¼­Á¶¿µ ( Suh Jo-Young ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀç¸ñ ( Lee Jae-Mok ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this report is to show three cases treated by an intergrated periodontal and restorative dentistry approach.

Methods: Three patients with Miller Class I gingiva recessions associated with cervical lesions were enrolled for treatment. Two patients received a connective tissue graft and resin modified glass ionomer, and one patient was treated with a connective tissue graft, resin restoration. Keratinized gingiva and relative gingival recession were measured.

Results: The mean reduction of relative gingival recession was 3.7 mm, and the mean keratinized gingiva increase was 2.5 mm. The percentage of root coverage was 80% in average. No signs of gingival inflammation or bleeding on probing were seen. The patients were satisfied with the final esthetics and had no more dentin hypersensitivity.

Conclusions: This report indicates that teeth with Miller Class I gingival recession associated with cervical lesions can be successfully treated by a connective tissue graft combined with restorative dentistry. However, longitudinal randomized controlled clinical trials must be performed to support this approach.

Å°¿öµå

gingival recession;glass ionomer cements;tooth abrasion

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI